The reversed order of the same words as a differentiating factor: the case Betsport v.s Sportbet
The European Union trade mark No 18736246 named Sportbet was applied for in class 41 regarding gambling services. In response, Circus Belgium S.A., owners of the trade mark Betsport, filed an opposition to the registration under Article 8(1)(b) of the EUTMR. However, the opposition was rejected in its entirety as no relevant similarity was found between the two signs despite the fact that the services offered were identical.
Tuesday December 17th, 2024
Invalidity Proceedings: Unfair Exploitation of Distinctiveness
El 10 de diciembre de 2020, la coadyuvante Monster Energy Co. (en adelante, "Monster") presentó ante la EUIPO una solicitud de nulidad contra la marca "Insomnia Energy", destinada a la clase 32, que incluía bebidas energéticas.
Tuesday December 10th, 2024
Protection of Computer Programs in the EU: Limitations on Modifying Variable Data
The Court of Justice of the EU recently issued a ruling regarding the scope of legal protection for computer programs under Directive 2009/24/EC, which lays the foundation for copyright in software within the EU. This question was raised by the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court of Civil and Criminal Matters, Germany).
Tuesday December 3rd, 2024
AIJA Seminar in Málaga: New Technologies: Is IP/TMT and Antitrust Law Future Proof?
From October 24 to 26, 2024, AIJA held a seminar in Málaga, organized by the Intellectual Property, Technology, Media, and Telecommunications (IPTMT) and Antitrust Commissions. The conference, under the theme "New technologies: Is IP/TMT and Antitrust law future proof?", attracted lawyers and experts from around the world to discuss the future of these areas of law amid rapid technological advances.
Tuesday November 26th, 2024
Pattern mark. Lack of distinctiveness
In the resolution dated September 13, 2024, the EUIPO rejected the European Union Trademark No. 18 969 849, based on Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR, on the grounds that it lacked distinctiveness.
Tuesday November 19th, 2024
It is not necessary for the public to believe they are acquiring an original product for it to be an ip infringement. Spanish Supreme Court
On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court, Second Chamber (Criminal), issued a conviction against the appellant, a co-owner of a retail establishment, for offering counterfeit products of various prestigious brands, such as Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren, Levi's, Calvin Klein, Adidas, Carolina Herrera, Fila, Fred Perry, Lacoste, Nike, Armani, and Guess, without the authorization of the respective trademark’s owners.
Monday November 11th, 2024
Academic Plagiarism: Copyright Infringement in a Doctoral Thesis
On September 6, 2024, the Commercial Court of Madrid, Section 07, issued a ruling in a case of intellectual property rights infringement. The plaintiff alleged, under Article 1 and subsequent articles of the Intellectual Property Law (hereinafter, IPL), that her work "MARIANA OF AUSTRIA IN THE POLITICAL CROSSROADS OF THE 17TH CENTURY" had been plagiarized by the defendant in his doctoral thesis "THE GOVERNANCE OF THE HISPANIC MONARCHY DURING THE REGENCY OF MARIANA OF AUSTRIA (1665-1675)."
Monday November 4th, 2024
Cristina Hernández-Martí Pérez speaks at the Non-Traditional Trademarks Conference organized by the Industrial Property Court of Chile and ASIPI
On October 22, 2024, our partner, Cristina Hernández-Marti Pérez, participated as a speaker at the prestigious Non-Traditional Trademarks Conference organized by the Industrial Property Court of Chile in collaboration with the Inter-American Association of Intellectual Property (ASIPI).
Thursday October 24th, 2024
Refusal to register a trade mark in Class 33 on the grounds that it conflicts with the Appellation of Origin ‘Toro’ (Denominación de origen TORO) and misleads the consumer
The European Union Trade Mark No. 17 966 918 was filed for Class 33, related to alcoholic beverages. The REGULATORY COUNCIL OF THE TORO DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN filed an opposition against all the goods, invoking Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(5), and Article 8(6) of the EUTMR, based on prior rights.
Wednesday October 16th, 2024
Community Design – Insufficient Evidence to Prove the Existence of a Prior Design with Similar Characteristics
On September 11, 2024, the Third Board of Appeal of the EUIPO dismissed an appeal regarding a request for invalidation of Community Design No. 5 809 746-0001. The design in question pertains to the construction of a portable sauna.
Friday October 11th, 2024
Hernandez Marti abogados participated at Marques annual conference
The 2024 MARQUES Annual Conference, held in Stockholm from September 24-27, gathered over 900 intellectual property practitioners to discuss the evolving challenges in the field.
Wednesday October 2nd, 2024
Intellectual property crime – The incorporation of an artistic work by a third party in a product intended for commerce
On February 29, 2024, the Supreme Court (Criminal Chamber) issued a ruling addressing a dispute concerning a crime against intellectual property. The company ABASIC S.L., creator of the artistic prints for the brand Desigual, faced off against Ali&Alex, S.L. and its manager Daniel. They were accused of marketing handbags that reproduced ABASIC S.L.’s original artistic creations without authorization.
Monday September 30th, 2024